So Much for ‘Learn to Code’
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
But telling tens of millions of Americans to force themselves to learn a skillset they hate so that 1% of them can get a white collar job is a terrible way to build an economy. Schools try to teach kids to code in kindergarten now on the off chance that the top 10% of performers will end up in STEM, and then the other 90% just have... a useless set of a skills and have to figure something out for themselves when they turn 18.
But in 2003 I was called to help with a family printing business. It broke the cycle and I realized I loved computer challenges personally, but not necessarily the challenges that are presented to you as part of a technology organization.
Up to today I have done other things for a living including Public Works construction and factory work. It requires skill and attention but can be menial work with long hours. But my idle thoughts are my own and time away from the keyboard is spent thinking of new approaches and solutions to problems.
So I have become a computer hobbyist, just working on projects I enjoy.
All the new entrants and the expensive senior folks doing the low-hanging fruit such as typical frontend UI, data collection and data science work are almost certainly expendable and are the main targets in the ChatGPT age. Everyone else left in the middle and in other areas have time to switch to something less trivial in the tech industry later.
Learn to adapt.
code is the easy part i never actually get to do. ai cant do my job and neither can someone who only knows how to build a shitty to-do list webapp.
ai is a force multiplier not a leveller.
> ai is a force multiplier not a leveller.
Agreed - AI is basically google that talks to you in human english. It regurgitates info from past that it has scraped from the net.
Until chatgpt can take a jira ticket with non-sensical requirements with typos and a figma that contradicts those requirements, and then spit out a working deliverable, I am not concerned about AI taking my job.