If in doubt, remember: the software is distributed in the hopes it will be useful but with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND.
If in doubt, remember: the software is distributed in the hopes it will be useful but with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND.
Don't complain about the downvotes or the well-deserved replies then.
> object to its use in professional contexts
Liability limitation is standard legal boilerplate in literally every free software and open source license. No doubt it's also present in the terms of service documents which nobody reads before accepting. If you're gonna object to using software based on that, you might find you'll have to rewrite all of it or pay top dollar for service level agreements.
And how is the limitation of LEGAL liability relevant in the realm of moral one (shame etc)
It sure as hell matters when a guy comes here posting about how C programmers need to be sued for negligence. Can you imagine some asshole suing you because you started a project on GitHub but didn't use one of the approved languages?