(along with AI companies of course)
They're doing well numerically when it comes to funding but is there anyone who has actually lived materially longer as a result of the field?
https://www.wired.com/2008/03/ff-kurzweil/#:~:text=He%20is%2....
I will spend my time living instead of trying to avoid death.
Death is the end of EVERYTHING for an individual. What could be worse than that?
Everything else, we can figure out for ourselves, given time - pushing back death gives us more time.
More time is fine but don't waste it by trying to avoid death (protip: you can't)
Longevity isn’t really about adding more years. No one wants to live another 10,20,30 more years how we currently do. But, if you can improve everyone’s health span, the amount of healthy, able bodies years, why wouldn’t you? It would be a great relief to our health care system. People can spend more time doing what they love without worrying about their body giving out on them.
Being someone who lost two immediate family members before 30, I’d do anything to have had them live longer and healthy instead of watching the slow and fast decline of the human body.
That is, if humanity doesn't destroy itself before then.
Chugging 300 pills per day - you will still die.
It is inevitable.
https://omniorthogonal.blogspot.com/2013/06/the-anti-kurzwei...
I can only think of one other medical startup coming out of the Berkeley-area EA/rationalist cluster, which would be Equator Therapeutics. They're working on an anti-obesity drug, and my understanding is it's going pretty well. But maybe you have others in mind?
(MetaMed came out of the NYC-area rationalist cluster and ~predates EA, and Alvea came out of the Boston-area EA group and shut down after their vaccine candidate gave disappointing results in human trials.)
[0] https://nitter.net/Aella_Girl/status/1705772547781140541
Not saying this company is or is not legit, but this doesn't seem like a reasonable vector for criticism.