it's also super easy to lie about something like that. what are the practical consequences of accidentally adding an extra "k" character on there? or what is deemed as the definition of "happy" or "user" — could be extremely weak definitions
Not to be too cynical but I would also had my doubt. 130K is huge number for a brand new product, the 3 avatars shown are stock photos.
And when you combine that with the advertised "845,022 formulas generated, so far." (6 per person) + "4 requests per day." (on free plan) , seems very unlikely that there is that much paying or regular users.
am i misssing something....but what can someone do with this that they cant do on chat gpt.
Maybe 130k people have visited the page, or seen the tweet..
I believe this is the standard way of doing things now. And has been for decades. Practically all big brands used some form of "growth hacking techniques" on launch so you can't really blame newcomers.