Covid has broken the social contract between parents and schools
capx.co
capx.co
I believe that this is the study in question, but I have not verified whether my recollection above (of the story as it was told to me) matches the actual study:
<https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2587744_A_Fine_is_a...>
Test results also show significant decline in the US: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-pandemic-has-had-deva...
My wife and I had just started sending our daughters to public schools when the pandemic hit (kindergarten and pre-k). We were excited about some of the special programs available in our school district. But the public schools handled the pandemic so much worse than many of the private schools, some of which stayed in-person throughout the pandemic, sending students home in clusters of just 6 to 12 when someone got sick... when nearby public school districts were closing down entire districts at a time on the strength of a single student's illness. We moved our girls to a private school that stayed in-person, and I don't think we're coming back anytime soon. We're pretty happy where we are, and I expect that public schools will need to spend significant resources managing their social and academic pandemic fallout, leaving less time for students who have not (yet) fallen behind.
The online learning was abysmal, leadership seem to go out of their way to antagonize parents, teachers for the most part, we're OK, but some became really condescending. We pulled all four of our kids out and put them into a homeschooling group. Now they are in private school, which we pay for, and have much more control and direction over our children's education.
Attendance isn't fundamentally the problem. Self-paced learning is what's needed here. It should be okay to have students at varying stages of learning the material.
Teachers should be careful about wasting class time with lectures. Flipped classroom model or similar is probably the way to go - lectures in video watched at home, class is for practice/homework/support.
They don't really look at why kids are off school, just that they are.
A child that falls into a coma is counted the same as the child of a negligent parent that doesn't care or even know whether their child goes to school.
This then gets fed into these sorts of studies that are used to blame various things.
Rightly or wrongly, one of the things being blamed is ongoing teacher strikes. It's seen as very hypocritical for teachers to say that a parent taking a child out of school for a day is bad, but that it's also OK for the school to have to close due to strikes.
We’re assuming test scores are a valid metric for success later in life.
Test scores also correlate with parent’s educational background, the community students live in, and their families income [1]. These factors are not affected by the student’s attendance, but attendance can be affected by these factors.
[1] https://theconversation.com/students-test-scores-tell-us-mor...
Likewise, the idea of school as a place we lock our kids in for a fixed number of hours per day is potentially dated, and it would be interesting to see how it could transform to something more aligned with what we actually want to achieve as opposed to the process.
There is also a link, school prepares you to tolerate spending your day somewhere being told what to do. Maybe we can do better.
I do what I can to bring my children to school, but I'm not going to die over it.
School needs to change so much and we are so far from it