Even Samsung has been way more cautious and tame with their designs, excluding the Folding devices which are true innovations.
Even Samsung has been way more cautious and tame with their designs, excluding the Folding devices which are true innovations.
The smartphone market gets less and less diverse.
I had a friend on that trip have a perfectly working iPhone 5 throughout the trip and it finally got me to bite the bullet and try an iPhone. That led to me trying out a Mac and now I am completely in the Apple ecosystem after 15+ years of switching back and forth between Windows and Linux and probably never looking back. So thanks Google, you got me to abandon not only Android but also Windows/Linux. Hell after the LG Nexus 5 mess, I also avoid LG from now on.
Then AirPods came out and they worked with my Samsung note, but I got an iPhone at upgrade time. 5 years later and I’ve just got my second iPhone and my house is fully in the Apple ecosystem.
The “how do we?” Or “can you setup this” have effectively stopped from my wife and kids.
What's wrong with these options?
How so? Comparing [1] and [2] shows the geekbench scores between the fairphone 5 and the pixel 7 are pretty similar.
> missing some fundamental quality of life stuff that other phones have offered, usually for years
I'd argue that statement is backwards: the non-mainstream phones have been offering quality of life stuff that the mainstream phones have abandoned years ago, namely user-expandable storage via microsd cards and user-replaceable battery.
[1] https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/1891321
[2] https://browser.geekbench.com/android_devices/google-pixel-7
As per how they compare, reviews of the FP5 seem to say it has the following deficiencies:
* Poor display - bad brightness, which hurts outdoor usability
* Bad battery life, even considering the wimpy processor
* Underwhelming performance, which will make it feel sluggish faster
* Mediocre speaker performance
* Mediocre cameras
You're paying a whole lot, in my view, for something that has an easily replaceable battery... which is something you might do maybe once in the life of the device? If you're keeping a phone longer than 5-6 years, I suspect performance of the chipset is going to become a big issue. Additionally, with the bad battery life/performance already, it'll incentivize you to want to upgrade even sooner.
As someone who used a Galaxy S3 for over a decade and has now "upgraded" to a friend's old S9, I can't understand this at all. What kind of quality of life stuff am I missing out on? I'm missing having a removable battery, but at least it has a sd card.
In summary though, it's a phone that has 1-3 year old performance metrics at nearly-flagship pricing.
I'd take a removable battery all things being equal, but it seems abundantly clear that FP5 would be making compromises in device performance compared to current flagships. That tradeoff just isn't worth it to me. Maybe it is to you.
I'd love to pay like $500 for a pinephone with hardware from 3-4 years ago.
The value argument is valid of course, but much like PCs, major phone manufacturers get a lot of their profit from bundling crapware so it's inevitable for one that doesn't to cost more.
Nothing wrong with the fairphone, though, I've been happy with it.