It is also valid to argue the opinion that a law could be beyond a certain threshold of immorality where a business should prefer the risk of a federal lawsuit over complying.
It is also valid to argue the opinion opposite to these two opinions.
My point being that it is the antithesis of reason to assert that these opinions simply can not be held, or are somehow fundamentally invalid.
Police were given a tip. They talked to the women, who then admitted to coordinating the crime over chat. A warrant was issued. No 4th amendment was violated.
1. https://www.theverge.com/2022/8/10/23299502/facebook-chat-me...