This kind of argument is always absurd to me because it doesn’t matter if it learns like a human or not, it’s still not a human.
(I would also argue that it learns and generates images in ways that are non-human, just based on speed and scale alone)
(I would also argue that it learns and generates images in ways that are non-human, just based on speed and scale alone)
But systems of law are still capable of recognizing the distinction between the personhood of corporations and of people, just as they can recognize the difference between humans and AI even if AIs can be demonstrated to "learn" the way humans do. As always, context and nuance matter. Laws aren't written or decided upon based on pure logic or calculus but on what human beings want and consider to be in their self-interest.