> My position is pretty clear - there are some protected classes that shouldn't be discriminated against for membership in that class for employment and service.

And in case of employment in many countries you can’t be fired unless there is a just cause. The same thing with important services that cannot be denied at will, eg buying drugs at a pharmacy. There are many protections in many countries in many spheres of life that go beyond the color of your skin and your pronouns; and those countries are doing okay.

> The government shouldn't require big tech companies to carry all posts regardless of content

> In sum, it's like the government telling newspapers that they are required to print every letter to the editor no matter how many are received and how obscene they are.

What about the government deciding who should be published on YouTube or in a newspaper? What about the government deciding who should be able to watch or read stuff? Wouldn’t it be scary? Why? Isn’t because the government is a huge powerful monopole? I don’t want my life to be governed by a will of a huge powerful monopoly, even if it’s democratically governed and especially if it’s not even that.