most unsurprising cancelation ever. His whole schtick was being an impulsive, out-of-control drug and sex fiend.
* So, this is happening - appears to be about the scenario under discussion here
* Hang on, Biden 9/11 Speech Was A Lie?! - conspiracy nuttery
* Bill Gates Has Been HIDING This And It's ALL About To Come Out - with an anti-vax symbol in the thumbnail, conspiracy nuttery
* Hang On, Obama Did WHAT?! - hard to say what this is about
* So, Trump Just Said THIS About Vaccines And It Changes EVERYTHING - conspiracy nuttery
* So, They LIED To Hawaii Victims About THIS - conspiracy nuttery
* So… They Fcking KNEW It Was A Lie All Along - conspiracy nuttery
Tucker’s Countdown To WW3 Has Started… - doomer nonsense
* The FBI Have Been Harvesting Your DNA?! - conspiracy nuttery
* So… Trump Just Changed EVERYTHING With This Move - no idea
* Shoespiracy EXPOSED: The HIDDEN Truth Of The Shoe Industry - conspiracy nuttery
* So… Tucker Just COMPLETELY FLIPPED The Ukraine Narrative - no idea but sounds stupid as hell
I didn't cherry pick anything, this was purely chronological.
Is this how you go about understanding the world around you?
I don't know that what brand says is right or wrong, and I'd understand the "oh dear, of course I wouldn't listen to that kind of riffraff" performance if you had HR or a boss to worry about, but who thinks that way when they have the freedom not to?
I have the freedom to poison myself with household cleaners every damn day, but I don't. Does that make me a 'sheeple'?
Its like going to a book club meeting, telling everyone that you obviously didn't read the book because you're not some unwashed heathen, and then proceeding to confidently give your analysis based on what you half heard someone on the train say about chapter 2.
Dude has lived so long without true consequences, getting second chance after second chance at the bbc before high tailing it to LA ... couple that with the probably epic amount of drugs and alcohol. My dude has cooked his brain.
> To be very fair his youtube titles tell a lot about their content. To any persona with more than a handful of working neurons, that's more than enough.
I can't agree with that. A handful of working neurons doesn't magically give you the ability to divine the contents of a book from its cover.
But it seems like you've at least watched some of his content and have your own opinion on it. I can respect that.
What I can't respect is when people happily form their opinions based on vague impressions gleaned from other people who also aren't familiar with the subject matter, and then pass that opinion on as if it's worth something.
> Just asking questions (also known as JAQing off, or as emojis: ""[1]) is a way of attempting to make wild accusations acceptable (and hopefully not legally actionable) by framing them as questions rather than statements. It shifts the burden of proof to one's opponent; rather than laboriously having to prove that all politicians are reptoid scum, one can pull out one single odd piece of evidence and force the opponent to explain why the evidence is wrong.