Under Musk, Twitter is handing over more data to investigators
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
Super easy to open one tweet a person sends me and due to either immediate login wall or due to a new bug, bounce right out of there.
Twitter links are starting to feel like those ExpertsExchange results in old Google searches.
There’s a sign out button.
The reason I initially signed out was because I was tired of scrolling past dozens of 0 follower, 0 likes, 0 RT, low value commentary by people who paid for Blue in order to get to the first substantive comment by someone who didn’t. That of course is also a significant change (not sure if he rolled this back since then and thankfully don’t care if he did).
I still occasionally encounter links here and accidentally click, if I had an account I would be an engaged user? For content on the platform it seems easy enough to boost whatever users remain active.
Facebook had a short period where I thought I might have to join to not miss FB only content, then twitter had a phase where you kind of had to read someone's stream of rant to get a specific piece of info directly. Both of those are completely past and they are just another way people link to primary content that remains on the real web. The only dark web that seems relevant to me, at rare times, is behind a newspaper paywall.
Twitter recommendation algorithm has actually become better- a lot less of content that are appealing to the mass, and much more that are appealing to me. I am spending more time on twitter now.
One downside now is Blue Tick spam. Before, top replies to a famous tweet would be smart, or a good counterpoint, and now it is just dumb blue-tickers, stans, and newsletter salesmen. As twitter boosts posts of paying customers, I am also seeing poor posts appear on my feed out of the blue- it's like someone thinking in the lines of- "he's an engineer, won't he like an 8th grade math puzzle?".
I am not paying for it, but my engagement has grown (I never try).
I am seeing more posts from my follows, too.
"Before Elon Musk, Twitter would regularly evaluate and eventually push back against government requests if they were a threat to dissidents or free speech," Yoel Roth, the former head of the company’s trust and safety team, said in an interview. But that requires vast resources. "Compliance, on the other hand, is the easy option."
Platforms often don't have to report such things - and do anyway.
Sometimes they want to cozy up to Gov. Sometimes a desire to acquiesce to authority gets in line first. Sometimes decision makers don't know that rights can and should be protected. Sometimes speech protections are a lower priority than shareholder dividends.
A platform may also be too broke to pay it's required bills. Affording counsel to protect uses could be a tough sell there.
Of course the original complaint of Twitter/X from the Twitter files was that they were suppressing speech sometimes due to government coercion, not that they were providing government with data, particularly with a warrant.
Can anyone who actually pays for WaPo elaborate?
> Elon Musk @elonmusk 14h At the risk of stating the obvious, I don’t know what’s going on with every part of this platform all the time, but our policy worldwide is to fight for maximum freedom of speech under the law.
Anyone working for X Corp who does not operate according to this principle will be invited to further their career at any one of the other social media companies who sell their soul for a buck