Each of those sounds like ideas for improving efficiency.
Personally, I am very wary of ideas for improving efficiency because:
A. They are ideas rather than solutions. They sound good on paper and have a long reverberation time in my head, but if there really was a problem there, I would do something about it not just think about it. [0]
B. Local efficiency is often globally inefficient...e.g. the bank teller problem in queuing theory. [1] Or hill climbing in optimization. I think about it as "reality is NP hard."
C. These things can be implemented locally and seasoned to taste on my own laptop. [2]
D. I come to HN to get things I did not know I wanted and every hard and fast rule about what I know I like turns out to have exceptions. [3]
YMMV and that's fine.
[0]: I am particularly wary of ideas about what other people should do because they are not in my control.
[1]: https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/21/what-happens-when-...
[2]: "Hacker" is on the tin. There's an RSS feed and myriad ways to automate a browser using user scripts and other tools.
[3]: Because it's aesthetics grate my day, I work hard to avoid Twitter and curse myself whenever I click a link . But occasionally due to statistics there has been something I was glad I saw.