Hacker News Reader

HNHacker News

Top New Best Ask Show Jobs

Comment by Quillbert182 | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

Quillbert182·

The results were released months ago, gunpowder residue was found on his hands.

https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/autopsy-cop-city-protester-...

View on HN

Or not?

Autopsy: Gunshot residue ‘not seen’ on activist killed at police training center

https://www.ajc.com/news/crime/activist-killed-at-police-tra...

"According to the autopsy sent to ABC News, Teran did not have gunpowder residue on their hands. Officials claimed Teran fired the first shot at a state trooper."

https://web.archive.org/web/20230419235728/https://abcnews.g...

While true, how it was explained to me was that the autopsy did a visual inspection, while the GBI test, which was done afterwards, was a more thorough chemical one. However, I don’t have a source on this one.

You're not going to see gunpowder residue without firing quite a few shots. The test is far more conclusion than a visual inspection.

Well, he was shot over a dozen times at close range (probably while sitting with hands up), and both palms had exit wounds.

I’m not sure how well visual inspection would work with all the blood and other carnage.

However, I’m also not sure if trace gunshot residue will show up on current forensics tests if multiple people empty their clips into you from a few feet away.

There’s also the question of why they shot him over a dozen times while he was unarmed.

Teran was shot in their hands. If they actually fired a weapon there'd be a lot more than five particles to find, and in a lot more places.

Maybe, but the commenter above claimed that the results weren’t released, which is false.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com