TikTok Rankles Employees with Return-to-Office Tracking Tools
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
I want to try a new challenge but I have a hard time finding a corporation that does this. There is always annoying cringey slogans about “collaboration”.
I have built large gaming communities. Hosted servers and worked with other people all over the planet. But some execs just want ass in the seats.
The metrics of performance and delivery were somewhat public and people pointed out that performance had increased due to a lack of distractions and interruptions.
The high leadership said the numbers meant nothing and people should return immediately. I will come back to this point.
Many many people did not comply with basic health requirements like using alcohol frequently nor using face masks. One specific case was a "tech lead" who was infected with COVID but only used an open face shield without a mask. He went to the office even being sick and he got at least 5 cases that could be directly attributed to him.
One of my team mates complained because to me and as lead for that team I tried to mitigate the problem.
To make the story short, the face shield guy was praised by higher ranks and I was reprehended to stay with my team mate.
I left the company about one year ago but my team mate stayed.
Recently the company used the same numbers to layoff 25% of people due to poor performance.
I am glad to say that one person had a video of the executive saying that the numbers meant nothing and used that to win a legal dispute with the company. All dismissed employees have received 1 year of salary and had all benefits extended for that period.
Not the best solution I assume but better than nothing
nice. dealing with these office theatrics after so many years feels utterly demoralising and demeaning.
need to find a way out...
I doubt TikTok has too many old-school types who just love being in office given they had barely a few hundred employees in the US prior to 2019, and didn't exist as a company until 2016, so it's a good control for the "outdated middle managers just want butts in seats/so they can exert power" theory (which as a prior middle manager myself I just didn't see in any of the hundreds of other tech EMs I interacted with).
TikTok did however scale from <500 US employees in Jan 2020 to >8,400(!) today. They set an aggressive hiring target of 10,000 employees by 2023 when the economy was going strong. Lots of biz dev and recruiting people amongst them who aren't required in a (predicted) recessionary cycle. So by forcing RTO and making it unpleasant, the rational conclusion (imo) is that they're hoping to thin the ranks.
Here's an article from CNBC about it:
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/12/why-rto-mandates-are-layoffs...
“Please, we’re not wasting time on unimportant things like that. We’re focused on the most important metric for any company: how many microseconds a particular butt is in a particular seat.”
I can guarantee that this will not be measured because it will make RTO bosses look bad.
By this point in 2023 in the world of social media, everyone knows that management in tech industry is a joke. Leeches who thrive off the labor of the real brains.
This is why there is so much backlash against RTO, and so much quiet quitting and so much job hopping. Until corporate structures continue to treat people like fungible headcount, people will treat corporations like fungible source of money.
corporations in the SF Bay Area often use contractors for hard work with deadlines.. twenty five years ago, employee salary at corporations generally started sliding downward.. thirty years of continuously rising executive pay however. Tech jockeys under thirty years old are a special case
Since people have returned to the office, the tools were kept and low level leadership are constantly being pressed to improve those numbers.
Now throw in a "need" to be aggressively tracking this stuff with WFH, the existing opaque structures, and now it all exists already when people RTO.
Companies not doing more invasive tracking are probably the exception or too small to pull it off.
Note: Pretty much no large companies have provided data points on why it's better to RTO, even if they're very data driven.
People assume this means they have no data and just want it. Really? Wouldnt that be a bit irresponsible to shareholders? A more likely scenario is they have data that they don't want to discuss publicly.
My company added a book "work from home" to the holiday/absence booking system, even though it can be several days a week, you need to book/justify everytime
The full time remote worker has so many spyware it gives anxiety, watch desktop, view camera, websites accessed, files written...
They say they respect developers privacy, and wont be paying attention, and I believe just because they are too busy at the moment to follow-up on anything. But as soon as things start to tighten up, it has all the ingredients to turn bad