Comment by dagmx | Hacker News Reader

Comment by dagmx | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

It’s incredibly awful if you have to be in multiple workspaces.

previously all workspaces appeared in a single column so you could see at a glance which workspaces had updates and could prioritize work accordingly. This allows for passively staying up to date.

Now all workspaces are collapsed under a single icon. So you see a single “update” but can’t see which workspace without interacting with the app. Now looking for updates is an active process.

This doesn’t even save space since the sidebar is still always there, and now there’s just more white space.

I’m in ~10 workspaces for vendors and developer communities that I need to be involved in as part of my job. This has absolutely tanked any sense of productivity. I can no longer see what’s happening at a glance.

Additionally they’ve made it so replies in threads are the same notification badge level as a DM. Previously it was white, now it’s red. So not only did they make it hard to see what workspace has a DM, I can’t actually tell if something is a DM or not.

Slack seems to be walking back their mistake 10 years ago of requiring independent logins for each workspace.

In slacks new product vision, you don’t sign into multiple workspaces, you sign into your “home” workspace and get invited via Slack Connect to other workspaces.

This seems to be reinforced by collapsing the workspace picker and making unreads in other workspaces less obvious.

Was it a mistake though? Independent logins are great for separation in a professional context. I don’t ever want my work workspace, vendor workspaces and personal ones intermixing.

Managing them in a single app was fine because it kept them distinct. Their new vision is directly at odds with real world professional use

I agree at the time it wasn’t a mistake. It allowed for vast adoption with Slack needing to implement the complexities of a single login accessing (for me) about a dozen workspaces.

But from a revenue perspective in 2023, it is a mistake. Of your list, which of work, vendor, and personal likely is a paid account? I’d argue in 2023 they only care about work and vendor and that is what they are optimizing their experience for at present. Now that adoption has saturated and the curve has flattened, the strategy of personal or even open source workspaces has served its purpose.

In short, now that they’ve got their hooks in, I’m sure they’d be happy for the personal workspaces go elsewhere, leaving just the paying professional context, and single login login, interacting with vendor/partner contexts.

I don't have the new design yet in any of my servers, but this sounds nearly identical to the iPad layout, which I've grown accustom to and don't mind.

Sure but are you multi tasking for work on your iPad with two apps up at once? The context matters because in a single active app scenario, you don’t have the same interaction considerations.

You can reverse the flag if you want to force the new UI on your local. I've updated the About section of the addon which shows you how to do that.

> which I've grown accustom to and don't mind

This happens in every redesign. People push back and claw their way to use the old design, eventually it becomes completely inaccessible. Three years later and the same people will complain about the next redesign again.

That sort of paints the people in the light that they don’t have a legitimate complain though.

Like yeah, enshitification gets normalized and you learn to live with it. But that doesn’t mean it’s fine either.

Slacks done redesigns before that were well received because it didn’t affect its functionality in the workplace. This does.

I’ve had zero problems with any of Slack’s previous design changes; I’ve welcomed many of them. But rolling all Slack orgs into one is a sudden and dramatic problem.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com