That said, as someone who is bipolar, has bipolar friends and has used cannabis for a significant portion of my half-century on Earth, cannabis usage is proportional to mood instability in myself and my friends. I have taken extensive breaks and noticed I am much more mentally resilient and less emotionally labile when taking breaks.
This can be true at the same time that cannabis use disorder increases the likelihood of mental illness is true. These are not mutually exclusive.
"Apt or likely to change."
is it grammatically correct to say "there is nothing more non-labile than a temporary code"
Probably a more common context for these words to occur is medicine, or more broadly toxicology, where you might have heard:
Heat labile vs heat stabile
The overall sentence is syntactically incorrect because you forgot to put a question mark at the end.
The sentence is semantically correct (which you actually meant to ask), though with a better alternate, as explained by the sibling comment.
Both can be true, weed can help with mood swings by numbing you out or shifting your mental state somewhere else. Weed can also be harmful because it numbs you, but harmful in a latent and subtle sort of way.
I experiment with the gummy's afterwards and found that the depression post usage effect was still present. Something about using them as pain relief changed how my mind responded to THC.
For sure, but that's an association. Which one actually caused the other? eg. perhaps you got into a state of mind that was less emotionally labile and so decided to take a break.
Sometimes I don't use cannabis for a while and feel fine. Then, while still feeling fine I unexpectedly end up in a situation where I can smoke a joint. Maybe it shows up at a birthday party. The days after there is a noticable change in my emotion regulation (less stable, easily feeling down).