What would it take to build a self-sustaining astronaut ecosystem on Mars?
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
Well. There's Clark's first law - "When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong." - which isn't directly applicable here, but looks awfully close.
Three would be better, and each should be capable of supporting the population of one of the others (that is, meaningfully under-utilized.)
When, not if, a biosphere breaks down the inhabitants will have a safe refuge.
Meanwhile the under-utilized biosphere can hoard, ummm, accumulate, spare food and water for use in lesser emergencies.