Unity appeals way more to hobbyist devs getting into game dev, and from what I've seen has significantly more resources and tutorials online than Unreal. Hopefully we see the same resources start to be published en-masse for Godot.
I wonder how they will figure that out. It is not trivial. And if they don't disclose how they are doing it, it has a large potential for abuse.
Would not surprise me if it was a heavy handed management decision dumped on engineers laps last minute, and is barely implemented at this point.
3 months of integration dev later, we start load testing, the external API fails spectacularly. They tell us to redesign to use their old batch API 35 days before our deadline. We tried, failed, ate shit with our customers. Provider was too big to pick a fight with. Startup failed.
Welcome to software engineering.
It's actually free, the license is MIT for the editor, so you can download the code, and change just about anything. You can also code native plugins in any other language. It has a build that supports C# and unlike Unity (idk if they ever fixed it) it supports modern C#, which Unity at the time did not support.
I would argue if your only concern is GDScript, you're asking for the C# build, but really GDScript is mostly Python-esque, I would be shocked to hear that anyone who knows basic Python cannot use GDScript.
While still terrible, is this an enormous walkback or was it always going to work this way and their initial communication was enormously incompetent?