SpaceX projected 20M Starlink users by 2022–it ended up with 1M
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
[1] - https://spacenews.com/u-s-army-signs-deal-with-spacex-to-ass...
Probably not very long assuming it was just impacting a training exercise. If it impacted real combat I would expect things to bubble up to a 4 star, then to the commander-and-chief, then a call to Elon explaining how all his companies public or private would be seized under eminent domain if it was not turned back on 5 minutes ago. Reflecting back on WWII and steel mills, etc...
He probably disallows it because the US DoD demands it under pain of not being reimbursed at all for Ukrainian comms support.
Your bias is showing. Only Russians and apologists for Putin consider Crimea to be "Russia".
Quoting: "Back in February, it emerged that Starlink had taken unidentified steps to prevent Ukrainian forces from using its satellite service for what the company regarded as unacceptable purposes, such as to remotely control drones.
At the time, SpaceX COO Gwynne Shotwell said that Starlink was never meant to be weaponized, but claimed that 'Ukrainians have leveraged it in ways that were unintentional and not part of any agreement.'
This may have had something to do with Russia issuing a warning to the United Nations that commercial satellite systems like Starlink risked becoming legitimate military targets by allowing their services to be used in warzones."
That's from the Register. There was another article at Defensescoop [1] that had discussion on hacker news here. [2]
[0]: https://www.theregister.com/2023/06/02/starlink_ukraine_defe...
[1]: https://defensescoop.com/2023/06/01/pentagon-contracting-wit...