Seems like some kind of SEO scheme to me. I’ve come across these “articles” by chance a few times. It’s a shame how far the site’s fallen, but that’s been obvious since 2016.
It seems like media execs are treating AI more as a cost-cutting tool than an enhancement. The tech just isn't advanced enough yet to fully replace human writing and editing. As a reader, I find these AI-generated articles pretty hollow. I'd rather wait longer between human-written pieces than get AI filler daily.
Reading the article, it almost sounds like AI’s involvement is incidental?
I wouldn't call it incidental if it's being used to launder plagiarism or ip theft
I think it’s a case of some dumb fuck MBA not knowing the difference between an API and AGI.