About the post content: I found the analysis itself a bit shallow, but I really appreciate this new perspective on doing review-first analysis without even trying the app first, since it's something I've never considered
Thanks for sharing!
About the post content: I found the analysis itself a bit shallow, but I really appreciate this new perspective on doing review-first analysis without even trying the app first, since it's something I've never considered
Thanks for sharing!
Lots of words to say nothing of substance.
If it reads like a bad high school essay - it's ChatGPT!
The useful part about the "If it's vapid then it's probably an LLM" test is that even if it ISN'T an LLM, it's still vapid and bad in the same way, and basically needs the same solution:
Folks, if you want to write, take writing classes somewhere.
All ChatGPT does better is produce blogspam with more consistent grammar, and over a wider range of topics than any single person could quickly understand.
I'm new to writing about marketing, so I hope to improve as I go and offer better insight with more practice.