She didn't consult ChatGPT and then start feeding her kid Tide pods. She took the diagnosis to a doctor. This is fine. This is productive. One could argue it wastes doctors' time, but in this case, it clearly didn't; our traditional random-search system did.
This article is on the media because Doctors claim they're good and effective. But when a unreliable product beats doctors it turns their claim on it's head.
This article isn't saying anything about chatGPT we don't already know. It's saying something damning about doctors.
[1]https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019606442...
Doctors at least make a best effort.
lol. Just skim the CFS thread for counterexamples
For chatGPT hallucinations, anything goes, you know that machine has no boundaries so that has to be taken into account.
Humans can be held to account by other humans if investigations are necessary to explain their own decisions transparently.
LLMs such as Med-PaLM, ChatGPT, and fundamentally all LLMs are non-deterministic and are unpredictable in whatever they give as their output, which is much more unreliable and cannot reason or explain themselves transparently why they decide to output their responses, but shuffle and reword their sentences randomly to make themselves appear coherent to the untrained eye, but when scrutinised by a professional, it is mostly garbage.
You would not seriously trust an AI to pilot a plane end to end without any human pilots on board or a FSD system to drive you from A to B whilst you sit at the back seat.
Well, people are doing exactly that with Waymo and Cruise, but with cars.
You might not, but I took a Cruise just the other day to a friend's house. Didn't even die or get into any accidents! (San Francisco)
For each guess in its diagnosis that is correct, there are around 1,000 incorrect suggestions that it makes, hence why it is untrustworthy in its diagnosis and for every answer it gives it lacks transparent reasoning, making it close to dangerous to rely on for medical advice.