Hacker News Reader

Comment by InclinedPlane | Hacker News Reader

Python is rapidly replacing ruby as the de facto scripting language for automation. It's also starting to replace Java as the language of choice for teaching programming and CS.

View on HN

Python has been the de facto scripting language of choice for automation in a number of industries for quite some time.

I don't believe (but correct me if I'm wrong) that Ruby has ever gained much traction outside of the software development world. Perhaps we're just seeing some natural consolidation.

Ruby is the language that Puppet and Chef (the 2 most popular configuration management systems) are based on.

The roles Puppet and Chef fill are small parts of "automation".

Puppet is written in Ruby, but has it's own DSL, so it doesn't really count.

I never knew ruby was ever considered the "de facto language for automation". Maybe you are thinking of perl?

No, he's thinking of Ruby. Puppet and chef.

What is the Python equivalent to Puppet and chef?

Fabric comes to mind.

Fabric is more of a task-oriented SSH replacement with some really nice bells and whistles, much different from Puppet or Chef. Some folks are working on Salt Stack which is python-based and more akin to the others.

Fabric is more like Cap than Puppet / Chef

bcfg2 I have been using it for a few years now. Have enjoyed it much more than the other similar tools we evaluated: puppet/chef/cfengine

bcfg2 I have been using it for a few years now. Have enjoyed it much more than the other similar tools we evaluated: puppet, chef and cfengine

The only modern and novel alternative is http://saltstack.org

I was commenting on the popularity of Python in absolute terms, not necessarily in the context of a relationship with Ruby.

With tools such as?

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here. Are you claiming I'm wrong or do you want me to do a google search for you?

A google search may not be as insightful as someone talking about a trend in popularity for a specific niche (automation.) I think the poster was just asking you to share specifics that helped form your opinion.

There are those who think that if a programming language is only usable with bloated tools, the programming language might be flawed.

That's interesting. It was exactly what I was thinking while reading the C# thread at the beginning of this article's comments. Yes, yes, mono whatever, but really ...

Reply on news.ycombinator.com