This argument could be applied to any condition with psychosomatic indicators.
Your suggestion that somatically-involved conditions aren't 'real' is offensive and what gives rise to the stigma that means we can't talk about this in the first place.
Your suggestion that somatically-involved conditions aren't 'real' is offensive and what gives rise to the stigma that means we can't talk about this in the first place.
I think the offense is going there without any double blinded science and then relying on non reproducible fields of research to annoy the patient.