Hacker News Reader

But ChatGPT would have fixed the issue faster in 45 mins than a human would. /s

A high risk situation like this would make the idea of using LLMs for this as not an option; before someone puts out a 'use-case' for a LLM to fix this issue.

I'm sorry to preempt the thought of this in advance, but it would not.

View on HN

Who are you replying to? Nobody but you talked about chatbots in this thread. Are you talking to yourself?

No they're preempting someone coming along and claiming this. Haven't seen it in the replies yet but there's typically one (or a lot in some cases) person(s) claiming ChatGPT will bring Jesus back from the dead sort of thing.

That's an odd nonsequitor strawman you constructed to knock down. Did someone suggest LLMs as the solution or are you just asserting superiority over an imaginary guy?

As expected it seems many here, even you couldn't figure out what the '/s' means even as I preempted it in advance before anyone comes and tries to claim it anyway.

So even putting the '/s' to denote sarcastic intent doesn't work on HN. Can't even take a joke here.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com