Don't own a house, only rent a small apartment in a dense urban setting. Don't own the means to your own transportation, only get by with walking and transit. Price meats so high most people can't afford them regularly.
1. Supply being limited because America outlawed dense urban construction decades ago. Dense cities cannot legally expand to meet demand and building up gets more expensive and unrealistic after a certain number of floors.
2. People in suburbs being further away from lucrative jobs - i.e. proximity to one's work is priced into the cost of the home.
3. Various government subsidies and tax credits that distort the market to produce more resource-intensive suburban housing.
It's not like the government subsidies and tax credits exist even though nobody wants them. They exist because, once again, that's what voters have suggested they want when they go to the polls.
I do agree, cities should be able to expand their density. I think in an ideal world people should be able to choose to live in generally affordable forms of whatever housing they want. And that's the thing, I'd like to be able to choose the housing style I think is good for my family. Many here would argue I shouldn't be able to make that choice, or that some choices (like single family homes) should be made so expensive most people can't afford it.
The real winner in this situation is government! (Exclamation mark, but I'm not actually surprised.)
You have to wonder whether this is a self-serving agenda for those who run it.
> The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations responsible for promoting international cooperation on atmospheric science, climatology, hydrology and geophysics.
from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Meteorological_Organizat...
Ok - so its the UN. The UN is an UNelected body that presents itself as the face of world government.
> The United Nations (UN) is an intergovernmental organization whose stated purposes are to maintain international peace and security, develop friendly relations among nations, achieve international cooperation, and serve as a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations
The unprecedented disaster is the increase in global governance!
Yes.
In what world is doing nothing the right choice?
But also, climate change is already making us miserable. I went on vacation and it was impossible to be outside between 12-3, so we had to plan our days around that. It's not a choice between happy and miserable, it's a tradeoff between less than ideal situations.
It's not commuting 40Km by bicycle, it's raising the price of gas to the point that people choose to live at a distance where they can bicycle to work. At the same time you need to build housing and bike infrastructure to make sure everyone can have access to it.