Why is that relevant? I assume prisons are required to adhere to medical restrictions.
My point was you are allowed to have food preferences in prison, assuming you are a member of a tribe with sufficient political power.
My point was you are allowed to have food preferences in prison, assuming you are a member of a tribe with sufficient political power.
My parents did not eat meat/seafood/poultry, and I was not given any either. As a result, I have a severe distaste for meat/seafood/poultry, I even find the smell makes me gag.
Should I be forced to eat meat/seafood/poultry in prison to get my protein needs, just because I do not adhere to a tribe with sufficient political power to force an exception?
No, you can eat peanut butter bread like SBF. Or ideally, realize earlier that you aren’t really cut out for the prison system due to your dietary needs and not commit the financial crimes.
>I think when you go to prison, in addition to giving up your freedom of movement, you give up your dietary preferences.
To which the response was to show that some people do not have to give up some dietary preferences, due to their tribal affiliations. For example:
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-03-19-me-36098-...
As for:
>And if you are worried about your dietary needs not being met in prison, then don't do shit that lands you in prison?
Innocent people also end up in prison.