Hacker News Reader

By "Humans", I assume you mean something like "adult humans, well-educated in the relevant fields". Otherwise, most of these responses look like they would easily beat most humans.

View on HN

I think most high-school educated adults, with the ability to make a couple web searches, would do fine on all these questions. It would take the humans minutes instead of seconds because they don't have the internet memorized.

Me, Kubernetes Haikus, time taken 84 seconds:

----------

Kubernetes rules

With its smooth orchestration

You can reach web scale

----------

Kubernetes sucks

Lost in endless YAML hell

Why is it broken?

I think you're spot on here. Yes, if one's trying to compare human and GPT intelligence, then you have to define what counts as memorisation and what counts as reasoning. But what most people outside of academia are trying to do is work out whether a GPT can effectively replace a human in some time-consuming task, and to be able to do so without access to the internet is rarely an important factor.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com