Should those who work from home be paid less?
thetimes.co.uk
thetimes.co.uk
What does this have to do with how much someone should be paid by an unrelated company? I’m still going to be buying food from wherever I’m working, regardless of it being near the office or not.
This whole article seems to have been written from the viewpoint of CEOs (which isn’t surprising, given the newspaper).
So home workers salaries will be lower in general.
If it's a job that requires physical presence, then that's how it is. It's hard to prune a tree or lay a pipe as WFH.
If the job doesn't require physical presence, then it doesn't, and office or WFH is irrelevant. Call center jobs, or lots of IT support.
Some jobs are in the middle: you need face-to-face sometimes, but not every day, in order to be effective. Teaching, or requirements engineering.
Some need to do site visits, some dont, their job dictates that.
The sole trader shows the world some people are more motivated about working, increasing their earning potential than someone who works for a bigger company.
So does working from home, show greater or less productivity, or does it highlight the slave driving nature of the managers?
Businesses should:
- give equal pay for equal work
- encourage remote work
- let workers choose where to live
...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37290009
And a related challenge:
Ask HN: global rate or local cost of living
I was enabled by the fact I can wake up, and almost instantly go downstairs and within one quick thumb scan on my Mac, get a couple of hours in before breakfast, and my end of day is equally as blurred as I leave the Mac up and unlocked allowing me to get right back in to it.
If I were an office body I’d not do either as the packing and unpacking of the laptop would be just enough inertia to prevent most of that.
I pay rent and insurance on my apartment. I'm provided water, electric, A/C, and consumer-grade Internet service. I have a kitchen stocked with appliances, supplies, and food and drink. I have a workspace, a desk and furniture, and of course my essential BYOD devices. There's my bathroom facilities, toilet and sink, soap and paper out of pocket. I have upkeep and cleaning costs for all this (I actually hire maids to do a deep clean).
I should be sending my employer a goddamn bill for this every month. Pay me less. Crazy talk.
Nevertheless, there's a valid rationale for reducing WFH wages. It's the ultimate offshoring. Companies don't have to care about employees working in HCOL centers anymore, so they can pay us "Rural Kentucky Wages" or "Inner-City Mumbai Slum Wages" or "Haiti We've Got No Infrastructure Left Wages" and we'll thank them for it.