Could high risk be the ability to monitor heart rate, or control motors? Could it be example code for those abilities that make them liable?
If RaspberryPi or Alphabet releases an educational board for experimenters but has features that could be used in a way that is considered high risk and if they are considered market powers, should they keep it from interested people because they can't fully disclaim liability?
How much should they reduce their feature set so that it doesn't tangentially run into this law. Can they just disable that part of the code, or would they run into the same problem as the GTA Hot Coffee case if it isn't gutted enough.
While it has good intentions, it will likely backfire some way as the lists of prohibited things grow or the market power clauses are reinterpreted to be applied to a wider range and smaller targets.