Google faces multibillion-pound lawsuit from UK consumers
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
[...]
> Estimated compensation of £7.3bn has been requested for about 65 million UK users over the age of 16, meaning at least £100 per person on average.
Although I think alleging that Google used dominance to raise the prices paid by advertisers is a fair point, it could be a bit of a (legal) stretch to prove that that translates to £100 per adult/adolescent. I wish them luck, mostly in hopes that Google will change their behaviour rather than shrugging and paying the damages.
I don't think there's 65 million people in the UK over 16.
I am a UK user over the age of 16. I did not ask for this to be done in my name. I am not defending Google here, but for-profit litigation by investment funds scares me more than Google does.
* after costs, performance fees, shareholder bonuses, litigator yacht private jet and helicopter parking fee(s), distribution cost, and £99 payment processing fee.
Litigating class actions is quite expensive. The for-profit nature is by design: it’s the potential for a large fee award that incentivizes class counsel to pursue these claims.
The individual claims are typically too small or speculative for individuals to spend money hiring lawyers of their own. Without this system, there would effectively be very little incentive for companies to refrain from violating large numbers of people in small ways. You might think this is the job of the government, but consider the resources it would take to effectively police every company sticking its hands into every one of the billions of cookie jars that exist. The fact is, governments can’t and don’t pursue most civil violations. Class actions are a kind of “market-based” solution. While imperfect, they do serve an important function.
And of course, you can always opt out if you want to sue on your own (or you just want the company to get away with it?).
__ * I don’t know the specifics of class action law in the UK, but I suspect both countries’ laws are undergirded by similar policy motives.