Hacker News Reader

Yes but you still use <a> tag for view transitions native to the browser. That’s the beauty.

Isn't that just how the view transitions API works?

Yes but this in contrast specifically to <Link to=

That’s great, but I’ve been able to do that with CSS for years.

That’s amazing, but others haven’t so it’s nice when a framework makes things more accessible for the rest of us!

What’s not accessible about CSS? This is already a low bar to pass. I remember adding CSS3 transitions a decade ago at my first internship.

It feels like there is a lot of brigading and shilling of Astro throughout this thread, as typical with web frontend frameworks.

It’s just the time savings, any competent engineer can implement better transitions, it’s just not very high priority these days. A simple one liner built-in is very convenient.

> A simple one liner built-in is very convenient.

Then why do you need bloated web UI that's not performant as React, Vue, Angular, Svelte? You can also just add 1 line of css classes to HTML elements to have transitions if you use a library like Animate.css.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com