System 2 is what we need (in AI)

doubling down on the bitter lesson takes infinite forms

> We believe that Kahneman’s System 2 is what will best serve as a blueprint for the next generation of architectures for AI. We further believe that in order to create this blueprint, we must revisit the major conclusions obtained over decades of research by Tversky and Kahneman, and that there are lessons therein which can guide and assist the engineering of tomorrow's systems.

> We believe that today’s ML has laid a strong foundation for System 1, but to get to System 2, we must embrace and integrate additional computational approaches, including the use of symbols.

We must go back, to the future?

System 1 & 2 as it applies to AGI