Honestly it would be better to just describe what your tool is, rather than trying to describe it in relation to something else. People know what workflow automation is, and people know what monitoring is. I was initially confused at what this product had to do with Github Actions.

Also, it would do well to link to your website ( https://www.keephq.dev ) also, rather than just something that immediately prompts me to log in.

And one final thing, having a demo video with some sort of narration to explain what I am watching people click on would also be helpful.

Obviously these are just my opinions, and they are worth exactly what was paid for them :)

You can keep a mention of another tool if you really want, but just make it clearer that you only mean it has similar syntax.

Concretely:

> Run a Keep workflow with `keep run --actions-file=./path/to/workflow`; or `keep run` assumes the file is called `blah` in the current working directory by default if not specified.

> The actions file has the following format, which may seem familiar if you've used GitHub Actions:

> ```

> ...

> ```

> further actions file examples are available here and a full reference is available in the docs here.