> in my case, "bike fit" is more of a process than a one time thing
That's very apt, and likewise. I see a new bike as the beginning of a long journey to where it is all set up and tweaked to just how I want it. Also: most bikes straight from the factory are rough ideas of what you could do with it and as a rule need all kinds of tightening, especially spokes and various friction grips. Also not rare to find cables that are too long / untrimmed, electrical bits that are so loose they can get trapped, loose bolts (and even sometimes missing ones). Think of it as an almost but not quite assembled kit and you wouldn't be too far off. I also probably have about a bike's worth of spare parts in every category and more than one in some (pedals, kickstands, saddle pins, pinions, handle bars etc).
> the distance alone is just part of the job. I do about 5.000km a year just on the 2x10km a day commute.
That's still quite a bit of good training. A family member does 2x30 km 6 days per week, 48 weeks / year. He should probably do bike reviews :)
> For me,I kinda regret now doing only a couple of 200km+/day low intensity rides this season. This would have revealed the problems much earlier...
I do a 2x70 once, sometimes twice weekly and on that distance most issues will show. I also can't do much longer anyway without breaking it up (knee issue, lots of steel in one leg). It's one reason my e-bike sees more work these days than the regular one.
> 1200km is Paris-Brest-Paris. The time limit for that one is 90h, so 86 is "barely just made it".
To me that is far out of reach, consider me seriously impressed with this.
> But I went full bikepacking on this one.
Even more impressed!
> Took way too much gear, which slowed me down a lot in the climbs.
Yes, weight is killing. We have a tandem here and I take my sons on rides with it and uphill you might as well be walking (which we sometimes do).
I don't like riding in groups at all, these are all solo rides or with one child.