This the problem with YouTube- they're judge, jury and executioner.
If you dispute the claim its judged by checks notes the person who claimed copyright.
Even if the original work is 120 - yes, 120 - years old!
See first comment on
If you dispute the claim its judged by checks notes the person who claimed copyright.
Even if the original work is 120 - yes, 120 - years old!
See first comment on
They should. But that doesn't prevent social consequences, including badmouthing them on their rationale.
Your response would be very relevant if the OP was proposing a law that would force them to carry such content, but that doesn't seem to be the case here.