> Harvard study from a sophomore undergraduate.
That doesn't indicate the quality of the study either way.
I don't drive that often but I don't use ridesharing services or the bus. I bike.
That doesn't indicate the quality of the study either way.
I don't drive that often but I don't use ridesharing services or the bus. I bike.
If the study uses non-factual information or does not interpret the data by understanding the nuances that may yield different interpretations, then the author's educational background may offer an explanation. But that isn't the critique here.
It's just reverse ageism with a mix of elitism.
Studies stand or fall on their own merits. The background of the author isn't actually relevant to that. If the study holds, it holds. If it doesn't, it doesn't.