Why isn't the video shared if it proves they're innocent? Smells strange.
Why isn't the video shared if it proves they're innocent? Smells strange.
They offered to share it with the city officials, apparently. There’s no strange smell in the fact that they didn’t decide to share it with the general public.
I mean, for all we know it might show the emergency services making an error in the heat of the moment and they might be holding it back to preserve their relationship with the city. (I’m not saying this is likely, just saying there are plenty of reasons that holding the video might be more tactful than nefarious).
> The video, which Cruise declined to share publicly [...] does not capture the patient being loaded onto the ambulance.
The SF Standard might have a tech bias due to its funding, but giving them access and offering the city access seems reasonable enough to not suspect anything fishy.