So You're an American?
state.gov
state.gov
Sometimes I wonder how much the average human is prepared to answer questions about the culture of their birth region, though.
The USA is huge and comprises at least 11 drastically different cultures. I know other countries also have similar "yeah, same country, different culture" circumstances. I'm not sure how many people realize this.
I haven't actual been outside of the US myself so I don't have a frame of reference for that, but different regions in the US really are quite different from my limited perspective.
I'd argue most countries fall into that description. It would need to be either extremely small (Luxembourg, Andora, Iceland ?), have a very strong drive towards unity (South Arabia, North Korea ?) or be so poor/inhabitable that not much people movement ever happens.
Otherwise any viable country that's not trying to kill anyone different from them will see a vast number of drastically different cultures coming in and staying for the long run.
I'm however broadly aware that there are many Spanish speakers in the US, and that in parts of Louisiana they speak Louisiana French...
The only thing your comment spoke to is the homogeneity of accents and language. There’s a lot more to culture than just that.
There's Walmart. There's the universal decay of the small town.
There's the stark difference between rural and (sub-)urban populations that's exactly the same across the country, south to north, west to east.
Other than sports there is no more local culture. And the biggest teams are part of national organizations.
There is the vast gap between the haves and have nots wherever you go.
We're a consumer society, so consider how marketing defines us. That's US culture.
Similarly, the thick Southern drawl is still a thing in some places, but when I travel it seems that a light twang is more common.
This might also be due to geographic mobility, but I think media is a more likely culprit.
It started with radio. With national networks.
Broadcast TV continued that, but cable meant TV no longer controlled by local folks with their local accents and opinions.
TV anchors all learn to spike with a bland accent. And now Sinclair's "local" stations have tightly scripted news, so local news is becoming more of a simulacrum of national news.
https://deadspin.com/how-americas-largest-local-tv-owner-tur...
I am also from the UK, but have lived in the USA for 34 years. When I first came here for a visit, I remember thinking there was more cultural variation between shellfish fisherman in Louisiana and Maine than there was across all of Europe, even though they had very similar jobs, spoke the same language, drove the same cars, watched the same TV shows (back then, at least). 34 years later, I stand by that assessment, though it has become a lot more nuanced.
Go a little back more in time, and the daughter languages become diverse enough that they get their own names, like English, Dutch, or German.
Give America a thousand years and chances are that some people will end up speaking something completely unintelligible to others.
Actually, it seems that they do, when they don't get on with their neighbors for one reason or another. And this seems to be accelerated when they are geographically close to the neighbors they don't get on with.
So yeah, in 1000 years the US will likely have more diverse dialects (and actually, a very different form of english (or spanish). But that doesn't eliminate the cause for the highly variegated dialects in small regions like the UK. Time has something to do with it, but not everything.
I wonder how much some simple tech by today’s standards will alter this course. Given media and mass communication it’s in our interests to reduce variation to increase our communication capabilities which hasn’t been the case for as long but I can see in the US anyways we’ve become more similar than we once were when we had stronger geographical anchors in our speech or culture.
The English spoken in America is from immigrants from the UK. American English was not suddenly invented out of whole cloth in 1783.
> Give America a thousand years and chances are that some people will end up speaking something completely unintelligible to others.
It doesn't really work that way now. The US has only had a relatively unified spoken language with the advent of national radio and television networks. Regions largely lost their dialects once everyone started consuming the same media.
Yes, but immigration involved language mixing. It's not like a remote village in Scotland could elect two hundred people to hop on a ship, cross the sea, and settle down in another remote village in Montana. For their kids born in America, they would have been lucky to find one other family that spoke the same dialect.
So the differences averaged out, in the same way kids growing up in London speak London's dialect regardless of where their ancestors came from.
There is a reason New Yorkers want to vacation in London and not Dallas.
This is very interesting. Can you share the source of this claim?
https://www.britannica.com/topic/dialect/Social-dialects
These 2 papers are more at the language level rather than the dialect level, but acts as a good jumping-off point for research and ideas about how social structure affects the development/evolution of language:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2798932/
Neither specifically address the development of dialects as a reinforcement of social subgroup differentiation, and right now I can't find the original place where I read about this idea.
Here's a video that went viral awhile ago because these people are speaking kinda like Boomhauer from King of the Hill: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/_OS7hzGxi0o
I am able to understand these people but for others it is unintelligible. I think America is such a melting pot that it also affects our accents. People travel all across the country and thus those accents converge. But certain regions tend to have much thicker ones than others.
Neutral American broadcast English is basically a midwest accent.
Sure but I'm not sure how this is helpful. I think most people are very familiar with the standard west coast accent given it's prevalence in Hollywood. But the are even regional accents. PNW is different from NorCal which is different from SoCal. Rural Oregon and Washington are different from Portland and Seattle. Sure. Tbh most of the difference wouldn't even be noticed unless one listens carefully, especially because there's such a mixing.
> Neutral American broadcast English is basically a midwest accent.
Are you referring to the North Atlantic Accent? This is an entirely fictional accent the was created for radio and not born from an evolution of social speaking behaviors. This is the accent you hear in "old timey radio" (Legend of Korra is a good example). Pretty cool accent if we're being honest though.
Hollywood doesn't use a west coast accent (which isn't even one thing, a Calfifornia accent is distinct from an Oregon accent), they use a midwestern accent to be as easily understood as possible to international audiences.
Actors take classes on this, it very specifically is not a west coast accent that Hollywood uses.
Quick question. Did you read my comment in full or just a few lines? Because I can't make sense of you disagreeing by stating the same thing I did. There's are hierarchical classifications/categories. I feel like you're being overly pedantic and thus it's not an honest conversation. Is this a conversation or you telling me I'm wrong and nothing I say matters?
Actors take classes on lots of accents.
You seem to imply there is an overall westcoast accent with minor reigonal variations. I'm saying that isn't the case at all.
> I feel like you're being overly pedantic and thus it's not an honest conversation. Is this a conversation or you telling me I'm wrong and nothing I say matters?
I'm not being overly pedantic, this is an honest conversation, it's not that I think nothing you say matters, but I absolutely think you were wrong with what you said. I think I made my point in a civil way. I wasn't trying to start a fight.
> Actors take classes on lots of accents.
Of course. Most will be more specific. Most actors will be taught the midwestern accent to be as clear as possible to the largest audience. That isn't true for other accent classes. It's funny you accuse me of being pedantic and not engaging in good faith when I feel this point was very obviously implicit in what I said.
First, there's a lot more to culture than accent. The cultures of the states you passed through are radically different, in ways that wouldn't be obvious to someone passing through.
And even if we take accent alone as evidence of cultural homogeneity, your road trip would likely have only passed through relatively highly populated areas if you stuck to the highways. Feel free to correct me if I'm, but I imagine you didn't take detours out into Appalachia, or head out into the swamps in Florida. Assuming you stuck to the interstate, it's not surprising that you wouldn't have encountered much diversity of accent, because the thick accents tend to reside in isolated areas. Population centers homogenize much faster.
And one more note: Michigan to Florida may sound like a large cross-section of the United States, but you really only passed through what we in the US would consider two distinct regions: the Midwest and the South. You missed New England, which is a hot spot of linguistic diversity in the US, with as many dialects in that small region as in the rest of the country combined.
As others point out TV and Hollywood also played a huge influencing factor here, but TV and Hollywood also existed before the convergence of dialect happened and were just as if not more important. It really came to a head in the 1980’s through 1990’s with the mandatory educational standardization of language and dialect, partly exemplified by no child left behind and related standardization efforts.
But I think culturally there are hundreds of cultures in the US, not just by region, but my demographics within a region. Black culture in Atlanta is very different than black culture in rural Georgia, is very different than Vietnamese American culture in Atlanta, etc. People from Europe are always looking at their monoculture and it’s internal variance and looking for a similar single dimensional variation. But America is culturally extraordinarily varied along many dimensions owing to its enormous communities of minorities from every other culture on earth, adapted over generations into something unique in the world to that geography plus ethnicity plus other dimensions. I’d almost say it’s so varied that it’s easy to overlook and just focus on the Generica experience presented by mass retailers and franchises.
I have several times encountered other Americans pretending they come from Canada, or complaining constantly about the USA. And I have witnessed Americans abroad starting arguments about politics or guns or something about another country or culture they know nothing about.
If you need to pretend you come from Canada to feel comfortable traveling maybe look at yourself. I don’t have any shame about my nationality. And I don’t feel any need to defend my country or engage in comparisons or criticisms that would lead to that kind of talk.
The government has been doing this kind of image management targeting foreign audiences (and, through them, the policy stances of foreign governments) as part of public diplomacy for generations; the new thing isn’t realizing it is necessary and “trying to help”, its reframing what it has been doing for generations and providing resources to train and encourage individual Americans to act as agents of the government’s public diplomacy efforts.
I didn’t deny that, what I denied is the claim that the recognition by the government that it is valuable to address various negative perceptions is a reaction to any recent change in overall perception, since they’ve literally been actively doing it for generations; what is new is the approach.
I'm not American, but I'm white and speak English. When I was backpacking Europe and Asia almost 20 years ago, I would often get insulted just for being assumed to be American. Of course that was when Bush was in power which probably had something to do with it.
http://web.archive.org/web/20200927073110/https://www.state....
>In the article: People outside of the United States are often curious about American culture, its politics, and the general way of life.
Worth pointing out, 60%+ of HN audiences are from US, roughly ~20% from UK.
I dont think most people are actually interested, but in English speaking countries we are constantly bombarded with US news, US politics, and worst, US culture war. This is further amplified by Internet and Tech.
Before the mid 00s, Modern Tech wasn't a common industry for front page news. New product announcement didn't show up in local front page until iPhone ( At least outside US ). But we now live in an age where a 5 years old kid in developed world would have played with a Smartphone, watched TikTok or YouTube. And Tech, which is 90% concentrated in Silicon valley has their own culture bias to export. As much as we the rest of the world would like to ignore it, it has its influence to the outside world. Look at Twitter for example.
It helped that I lived in Santa Fe which, (unlike where your bio implies you live), is a pretty-well recognized US place name in Europe.
One Swedish taxi driver was a fan of Louis L'Amour, and many others know about it through other westerns. An English hotel clerk, base on its reputation, guessed the population was 200K-300K (it was 65K then, 90K now).
If you are ashamed of something, you should be free to fix it, not obliged to leave.
According to one survey, French, Germans, and Brits are more proud and less embarrassed about their country than the US: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2021/05/05/5-national-pri...
Bear in mind how England and Germany also have a history of national pride connected with imperialism and the killing and subjugation of other peoples. Unfortunately, in the present-day the ones who voice their national pride most loudly tend to connected it to historic supremacy, as with far-right English nationalists using the English flag.
This makes it hard for people who do feel pride for the modern country to express that pride.
> If you are ashamed of something, you should be free to fix it, not obliged to leave.
Should immigrants not come to America and instead fix their own country? I don’t think that way but that seems to follow from your suggestion.
There are plenty of people embarrassed of America who aren’t trying to fix it or arent affecting any change. Wanting it to be different is neither of these things.
You should re-study classical logic.
You turned the proposition "If you are ashamed of something, you should not be obliged to leave" into "You have left therefore you must be ashamed of something".
This is a fallacy. I wrote "if P then Q or not Q" (if ashamed you are free to stay and you are free to not stay), which you turned into "if not Q then P" ("you did not stay therefore you must be ashamed).
Similarly, turning "If you are ashamed of something you should be free to fix it" into "If you are ashamed of something you are obliged to fix it" is another logical fallacy.
Just because someone is free to do something does not make them obligated to do it.
You can be happy to be an American, or you can feel a deep connection to your country, you can proudly defend certain values, but being proud of having "won" the birth lottery? I don't get it.
I never said that
Being proud of being a certain nationality is a function of many things. Your ancestors migrating, or staying in the same place, founding values, current and past culture etc.
Following your reasoning, one could say “I don't understand how you can be ‘embarrassed’ to have been randomly born in a specific country.” I think your frame misses whats actually being said. We agree no one should place the value or fault on random birth origin.
I don't think you can or should be proud or ashamed of something you had no influence over.
Do you find their pride less confusing?
It also made me appreciate what American culture is all about. It has its pros and cons but it is very uniquely American.
One thing to keep in mind for all travellers is that every single country is different. So even if you learn the norms in Vietnam, you will need to relearn everything next time you go to Brazil.
Per capita consumer spending, USA 2021: $47915
Per capita GDP, United States 2023: $80,034
If Germany were a US state, it would rank somewhere between Mississippi and West Virginia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nomi...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territ...
(slight edit for formatting)
But such conversations are very rare.
Quantitatively, only ~33% of Americans have a valid passport.
Both are depressing and embarassing.
None of my US friends have one. It's so strange to me.
Go ahead, ask me why there are so many violent gun deaths, why we use so much energy and carbon per capita, how someone like Trump could be elected, how many cowboys there are, do I have a gun, why are US houses so big ... happy to give my take, and it's not difficult.
The section(s) on communication styles (particularly high and low context) are a bit brief but quite effective, I felt.
Just because you've thought about these things doesn't mean the other half has
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36190015 ( 89 days ago )
"The Culture Map: How to Navigate Foreign Cultures in Busines"
And regardless of what country you're from, only an asshole starts asking you pointed questions like that, this isn't a realistic scenario obviously. Imagine asking a random chinese tourist harsh questions about their country's behavior, they would hopefully and rightly tell you to fuck off.
I've only skimmed this page, but for what it's worth the state department creates educational material for travellers, issues travel advisories warning people not to travel to this or that place under exigent circumstances (eg natural disasters and rising geopolitical tensions), gets emergency passports to people who have lost theirs in a foreign country, etc.
I don't know that there wasn't an agenda here, but on it's face it seems like it's part of their duties.
I've never personally been in a situation where people asked me weird questions about my country, but I don't really talk to people much when I travel (my loss, perhaps). There's a cliche about telling people you're Canadian or putting a maple leaf on your backpack, so I imagine some people have had that experience. I did once ask some probing questions of a Chinese hostel-mate about the Great Firewall (which, fwiw, he said was to protect Chinese people from American spy agencies - not my position, just what I was told), so maybe I am "that guy."
Sometimes it's fun, sometimes it's outright triggering. Part of talking with people from all over!
How do we answer the more relevant questions:
"Why does your government meddle so much in the business of other governments? Why does invoke so much death and war in the middle east? Why did you invade Iraq, again?" etc etc
Those ones I find truly difficult to navigate, since it seems like American citizens get little say in how much power is projected overseas. Wonder how the State Dept would advise?
You are a high priority target for robbery, kidnapping, extortion, scamming, murder, and a host of other things from the lovely locals you're mingling amongst. Stay to well lit areas, don't stay out late, don't follow anyone around, dress in a way that does not draw attention to yourself (better if you can get into local garb), and assume every single person is there to kill you. Limit your drinking, and if you do drink do so amongst expatriates and travel friends, and guard your drink at all times.
People do not like Americans. Many times their ill will has at least a logical foundation. While I certainly appreciate the state department attempting to manage image this isn't enough. Americans must be on the defense at all times. You must especially be defensive in non-western countries (where you are probably better off simply not going). While many people are easy going the mixture of zealous propaganda about Americans, and America's own negative image, will have you perceived as a target more often than a friend.
Although the tourist is a universally-reviled species, the best tip when traveling is don't become the clueless, reckless, *sshole cliché American tourist. You can go to a hidden neighborhood brasserie in Paris, have a good time with the locals, and not be outed as an American tourist if you don't look or act the part.
Universal rule of life: be cool. (Many) problems solved.
People told me I needed to wrap my luggage in seran wrap when I went to the Philippines so that corrupt customs officials wouldn't put contraband in my bag. The airline workers had to hold back a laugh at my naivete when they checked my wrapped luggage.
To be fair I did see political graffiti from communist rebels who occasionally kidnap people for ransom, but it was obvious on sight that I was American - which prompted people in the street to try and sell me beautiful craft work, not to kidnap me.