When the facts are on your side, you bang on the facts. When the law is on your side, you bang on the law. When neither is on your side, you bang on the table.
Given that council wants to win a prosecutor needs to be proven competent and yet lose 2/3rds of the time to be a neutral one?
They had antitrust cases planned so they brought in an aligned antitrust attorney? Would Google be complaining if their lobbying efforts accomplished a DOJ anti-trust official with the opposite bias? It would only be selective bias if he only brings cases against Google, let's see what he brings.
"Your honor, the prosecution is CLEARLY biased since they stated that crime is illegal!"
What exactly is The Hill? Their website seems like a normal news website but their YouTube channel is ideologically somewhere between Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones.