Bike Lane Sweepers (2021)
worldsweeper.com
worldsweeper.com
All over London we have these mechanised sweepers of a similar type to the link below which are very narrow and can fit down most two-way cycle lanes, some one-way ones and also down narrow paths in parks.
https://www.aebi-schmidt.com/en/products/schmidt/sweepers/mf...
Picture at the bottom of the page. https://www.bortekpwx.com/bike-path-lane-cleaning-sweeping/
Product page (I notice some of the pictures are in Denver) https://www.bortekpwx.com/product/dulevo-dzero%c2%b2-electri...
Edit: and also confiscated orange “share the road” and other construction signs that block the bike lane.
To make the latter politically acceptable, they usually add “bike lanes”, which have complicated concrete barriers lining them, and are painted with solid green paint that is slick when covered in wet leaves.
Ignoring the obvious problems (the barriers would, at best, bend a rim if you swerved into them), they don’t aren’t designed to be possible to sweep, so they’re frequently too dirty to ride in, and many areas have stopped reliably trimming encroaching tree branches.
(Sometimes, they convert car lanes to “bus lanes”, which are just normal lanes, but bus services are incredibly infrequent, so the lanes sit idle 99% of the time. Ironically, those lanes seem well maintained.).
The upshot is that now bikes get to share one fewer lane with cars than before, for a given number of commuters, drive times are much higher, fuel economy is much lower, and (based on breathing the non-cabin-filtered air when riding my bike) air pollution on city streets is much higher.
Of course, covid helped them meet their metrics, so there’s also a looming property tax and commercial real estate crisis.
This seems like exactly the problem that would be solved by a bike-pulled sweeper. Could you elaborate on why that wouldn't work?
Also, as a cyclist, I’d much rather be in a separated bike lane as opposed to directly behind a car and breathing in fumes there.
Anyway, never had the time, but hopefully this winter I'll try to do something
https://www.dailycamera.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Heavy...
After a big storm with feet of snow the neighborhood roads can become impassable to regular cars while the bike paths are bone dry.
Instead of tragedy of the commons, how about a little stewardship of the commons.
Otherwise, sweepers will need both extra robust tires and to be ready change flats.
If you're cautious you can just avoid those, but for elder bikers who can't do quick maneuvers or are cycling at night, especially if gravel and bigger rocks are found in curves, my feeling is that it can be potentially quite hazardous.
Seems I'm one of very few (if any) who are constantly stopping to kick away such stones and debris, but it would really be better with a systematic way to keep lanes clean.
There should be an online board for biking initiatives :)
What I really want is a sweeper ahead of my front wheel, though.
Also a regular bike checkup should includes tires checkup to remove the debris stuck in the rubber. Those can “move” and get you flat in the future.
Tubeless is a great solution for preventing punctures (especially sharp thorns left on roads after trimming of hedges and bushes), but it can be a faff to set up until you know what you're doing and the tyres are more expensive. You also "need" compatible rims to run tubeless unless you fancy a ghetto setup.
Would good tires still save me from these punctures?
Thicker tubes can help, too. I use some really beefy tubes. They're way heavier but it's worth it to me. I went from a few flats a month to no flats a year, back when I commuted by bike in Austin.
https://www.continental-tires.com/products/b2c/bicycle/tires...
I've seen similar bike patching mechanics on sidewalk stations in Beijing, and I feel like they would have a similar primary customer. The degree of construction and infrastructure work there means that there are always metal bits in the road. Nails, roofing scraps, welding rod ends, filler wire trimmings that get washed off construction sites in the rain and blown to the roadside by traffic are highly effective at puncturing bicycle commuters' tires. But they also make small holes that are a quick fix. Soapy water will show where the leak is, and pliers, a donor tube, and vulcanizing compound and you're in business again.
Gatorskins are harder, less supple, so they don't pick up the smaller bits of glass and metal that will work in over time. They are resistant to pinch flats by having thicker, stiffer sidewalls, so the bigger bits of metal or rock aren't so scary ( they won't be any more fun, you will feel them more ). But a nail is a nail and if you hit it head on it will go in.
Current ones are some Continental with 5mm reinforcement IIRC. I came home one time with a piece of broken glass stuck in the tire. It was just stuck, pointy end in the tire but did not puncture it, so I just removed it and laughed.
Road shoulders are the worst place to ride, because that's where the crap accumulates that gives you flats.
Snow and ice are another reason to sweep bike lanes and it's interesting that in some active-travel friendly countries in the EU, they prioritise clearing the bike lanes first - presumably the theory is that bike lanes can transport a far greater number of people and cars don't usually have a problem with falling over when the road is slippery.
Snow, ice and wet leaves are definitely concerns though. If there is a hint of snow/ice, I will not ride my bike, as bike lanes aren't plowed/salted and I don't have snow tires (not enough days of freezing temperature here to make it worth it). It's the only weather reason to not take my bike actually.
Broken glass is not a desirable feature of any part of the road, bike lanes or pavements (sidewalks). Puncture proof tyres won't help if someone loses their balance and gets a face full of broken glass.
The answer is to remove broken glass and other detritus. This is surely just a basic function of society.
Fantastic - no need to sweep anywhere at all now. We just wear thick boots and make sure cars have thick tyres
I doubt any pneumatic tyre would be suitable for constantly riding over broken glass. Solid tyres, however would last a while until they got completely shredded, but the ride quality of solid tyres is dismal. The problem is that the shock of a bump isn't distributed around the tyre as it would be with air, but instead stays in one place. That then requires a stiffer material to be used so that you don't put too many dings in your rim which makes the ride quality (and speed) worse. Riding on solid tyres really sucks the fun out of cycling.
While signalling would likely be helped by education, it is also worth noting that it can be difficult for cyclists to do it at speed on a busy road. Remember, they are on the road because the infrastructure does not exist and they are at speed because they have to keep pace with motor vehicles (within reason). Again, proper infrastructure would help. That includes bike lanes that are free of debris and where the surface is properly maintained. Ironically, hand signals are only systematically taught in driver education (some cyclists don't have a drivers license), few motorists seem to know what they are, and not using the vehicle's turn signal is common among motorists.
As for not stopping for pedestrians, that is common with both motorists and cyclists yet it creates more problems for cyclists. Simply put, when there is less than a one in ten chance that the car behind you will stop for a pedestrian it is very risky for cyclists to stop for pedestrians. Again, this is because a lack of proper infrastructure means that cars and cyclists are mixing.
The most important thing to realise is that cyclists pose very little danger to others and will often come off worse in a simple collision with a pedestrian, whereas people in cars are shielded from collisions whilst also posing a much greater danger to others.
What I'm saying is: tons of people commit varying severity traffic infractions all the time. If you think this is something exclusive to cyclists, that is more likely your own confirmation bias. There are a lot more drivers, and a 2-ton vehicle does a lot more damage to other road users than a cyclist, so the ultimate risk/damage to society is virtually entirely from drivers.
These drivers then have the audacity to suggest that cyclists are the problematic rule breakers on the road.
Of course, this should be a municipal task, just like it is here in the Netherlands. However, when municipalities don't care about cyclists, volunteers might pick up the slack.
The relevant quote: "Lermant is convinced that his company, Bike Lane Sweeper, will offer a needed product to cities in clean wherever a bicycle might be traveling."
> He stresses the large size of the potential market since the price is low enough for bike clubs and individuals to purchase. And, perhaps obviously, municipalities will find the economical nature – and perhaps the ability to leverage the pool of operators to include volunteer or paid bicycle enthusiasts with a vested interest in keeping bike paths cleaned.