I am curious, how did management respond when the progress slowed
did they revert back to the old method, did it deteriorate so fast there was no way to stop it, was the team not very important
what happened ?
did they revert back to the old method, did it deteriorate so fast there was no way to stop it, was the team not very important
what happened ?
They said that we didn't measure the work before, so they had no visibility into how much the team does. But after introducing scrum, they were very happy to see that the team usually delivered around 20 story points per sprint, while the other teams in the company did around 10.
In my view, if we estimated tickets in old process as we did after introducing scrum, we would have been delivering around 60 points in two weeks through old process.
Rule number 1: management is never wrong. The progress did not slow down.
i'm obviously turning this into a hypothetical