Hundreds of thousands trafficked to work as online scammers in SE Asia, says UN
ohchr.org
ohchr.org
From what I heard, which I cannot verify, it's more sinister then that. People take completely normal-sounding jobs in normal-looking and functioning offices. After several months of being paid normally for normal work, they're invited to a team-building event in SE Asia. There, they lose their passports, are interned in huge camps and are press-ganged into being scammers, and tortured or killed if they refuse.
This isn't your usual "can't cheat an honest man" tale where you sucker in greedy rubes with a promised free lunch.
For instance, the scammers would need some kind of credibility in the job market before the team-building exercise. Do they just start up new legtimate businesses with new people just for this purpose?
And the SE Asia slave camps need a huge amount of compliance from the locals.
And what happens when none of the employees return from the original country?
Myanmar is home to like 20 different civil wars. Some of these conflicts ended in ceasefires. The areas that got good ceasefire deals (Wa, Mongla, some "border guard forces" who the military lets do whatever they want in return for allegiance) generally have a high degree autonomy from the Burmese government. So these areas are essentially run by warlords who are accountable to no one because the Burmese government cannot enter these areas. China backs some rebel groups and occasionally puts pressure on them to stop various crimes but they quickly adapt (when China cut internet to Mongla they just started using satellite). These areas are home to the largest meth labs in the world, illegal logging, illegal mining, etc. So they are perfect for criminals as they just have to pay "taxes" to whoever is in power. I read a good book on this: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/62141000-stalemate
Some scams are in Cambodia and Laos. The survival of these mostly has to do with corrupt law enforcement. All of the scam victims are either Chinese or in the West so they have even less reason to care.
> For instance, the scammers would need some kind of credibility in the job market before the team-building exercise. Do they just start up new legtimate businesses with new people just for this purpose?
I think it goes something like this: You make $200 a month as a dishwasher in Cambodia. A friend of friend messages you and tells you that you can make $800 a month. Because you are hopeful and want to improve your life you do not thoroughly vet them.
> And what happens when none of the employees return from the original country?
If they are from the region there's usually no record because they are picked up by an "agent" and go through a series of illegal border crossings.
There are people who actually knowingly apply for these jobs too: https://vodenglish.news/underground-group-chat-teems-with-hu...
To be honest, it doesn't all add up for me as simply described: offices where multiple people suddenly vanish seem unlikely to escape notice back home, unless they're excellent at picking people without any support network to report them missing. But maybe there's more to it than the simple description. And there is an enormous supply of migrant workers in cities without friends or families to come looking until it's to late, so I suppose it could happen. Or maybe it's garbled in the transmission and the jobs are all actually out of the country, but they don't spring the trap instantly when you walk in
But at least it seems not to be simply little scammers tricked by bigger, eviller ones, but rather they really have people who were genuinely looking for at least fairly honest work being ensnared.
These people have to smuggle themselves out of their own country, then maintain a presence illegally abroad, then run an amateur investigation. It just doesn't work out like that.
It's really not that hard to make people drop off the grid in an uncaring world.
Laotian police have been quoted as saying that they have full authority to come into the autonomous region to investigate a crime, given irrefutable evidence of a crime — but that they can't come in without such evidence; and that it's very hard for them to get such evidence.
I'm guessing that by "crime", here, they probably mean "a felony" (or whatever the Laotian equivalent is) — which is likely the blocker for them, and probably the basis for the very thin line that these criminal gangs are treading.
I believe that "an escapee who can show that their organs had been harvested" would be irrefutable evidence, enough for a police raid; while "an escapee who told a story about being held captive for years" would not.
(And re: the other part, of some of the things happening there being "legal" — a large part of how these companies work is by indentured servitude, in the literal sense: they get people coming there to sign contracts for provision of services and equipment, that create a debt owed by the worker to the service/equipment-provider; and then they don't let them leave until they work it off. These contracts seem to have a lot of power for the gangs; they don't bother to chase escapees who haven't signed them, while considering people who have signed them to be "theirs to keep." Presumably, they've tested these contracts with local law-in-practice, and found that they actually work as a shield for what they're doing.)
See for instance CNN reporting that Kim Jong Un had his uncle torn apart by a pack of dogs. Generally once organ harvesting starts coming in to play, one should put on a very skeptical hat, while there is evidence that this has happened among some prisoners in China, I think one should remain skeptical on first-read of such claims.
Holy ####. This reminds me of my previous software developer job when we were supposed to go to South Korea for God knows what[0]. The reason why we had to go there wasn't really explained well to me, and I didn't care enough to ask because I was just excited to go to another country. In the end our application was denied by the embassy, and I always felt a bit disappointed by that.
Perhaps the possibility of my case being sinister is miniscule, but maybe I shouldn't feel too disappointed.
[0] the owner of the company I worked for was South Korean
If you would be invited to say Philippines, Indonesia (which covers Bali too), Myanmar, Laos etc. that should raise an eyebrow.
If the deal is more akin to "get in this van and my guy will take you to where you need to go", then that's another story.
That could have been their pickup from the airport.
a large number of situations, contrived or otherwise, can result in emergency diversions.
you may want to be sure a connecting flight is legitimate when travelling in 'suspect' regions.
this would be high profile kidnapping, but a source of non SEA persons, that would be more convincing, and a source of international ransom revenues, espescially if they were also accused of some crime.
There is only 2 airports where this sort of things happen. If your teambuilding event scheduled to be in some god forbidden area of Colombia for example, and if this doesn't bring any suspicion to you - well...
In all honesty, if AI is killing those organisations, that might be the only half way decent thing coming of the current AI use cases.
If it happened even once, it would be noteworthy. Do you have any reference to an article about it?
They’ve had decades of child and adult abuse and they continue to operate pretty much in the open in the USA and hardly anyone has even heard of them.
https://apnews.com/article/nc-state-wire-north-carolina-ap-t...
The idea that something like what the GP is describing could not happen halfway across the world because it would be so well covered is probably highly mistaken.
HBO is right now running the documentary series Telemarketers, about a US operation that is clearly a fraud, but it's protected by corrupt and bribed police union management.
I think we can all agree that trafficking is…bad. Yet there seems to be this strange political push back against anti-trafficking efforts.
I’ve seen it for years to the point of pretending it’s not even a problem. The recent political reaction to Sound of Freedom, which was not a political movie, is just the latest example.
It’s one of the most worrisome aspects I’ve seen in general “politicize everything” trends.
One of the worst banana republics in that regard are the USA: here in China we'd never let a frigging casino operator rule the country, we have a small pride still.
> local traffik orgs are armed with AKs
> police was part of the traffiking ring
These statements are not representative of Cambodia, local/Chinese gangsters don't run around with AKs, and the documentary is a little exaggerated like all documentaries but I don't doubt there were suicides and beatings.
Some Facebook ads were very clear what you were doing. There were not 100,000 working in Cambodia and most were not trafficked.
This UN statement is garbage, liars bore me. It's why this is progressing to organ harvesting and other rubbish because the UN is bringing it to fantasy.
Watch the doco and they mention the amounts they were making, then times that by 100,000 trafficked then all the ones who answered the Facebook ads and it doesn't add up.
It's the Chinese doing this, which the UN page doesn't mention. Maybe the report does. But it's a main point for a summary... if the truth mattered.
Video of 40 people escaping a Chinese run Cambodian casino https://e.vnexpress.net/news/news/40-people-swim-back-to-vie...
I was expecting that in that incoherent and ignorant flow eventually will be some nationality blamed, and I wasnt disappointed.
Fortunately, I have a rule to never make online friends. If I’ve not met someone in a personal or professional setting before, I assume they’re a robot unless proven otherwise.
Some pig butchers have also tried to contact my parents, but my parents are careful, and I immediately block any such number.
Pretty sad to see that these operations could easily be stopped, but the perpetrators live in extremely corrupt places/semi-failed states where they just pay bribes to the local authorities to leave them alone.
It was so frustrating at some point, my first questions to someone matching me would be are you a crypto or onlyfan scam? Man the online dating world has turned completely shameless.
[1] https://www.michigan.gov/ag/consumer-protection/consumer-ale...
The scammer starts first by building a romantic relationship with the target (this part can last weeks or months). Along the way, they start suggesting cryptocurrency investments on trading platforms that look legit at a glance but are fake underneath. They instruct the target to deposit money into a wallet, like any exchange, but the perpetrators just steal the tokens and show the mark fake figures.
It’s a long term thing that takes a ton of work…I have no idea how the scammers even pull it off at scale.
This site goes into more detail; https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/feature/Pig-butchering-sca...
It is appalling that no social platform is taking this seriously.
The big social media corps won't eat into their profits by hiring people to find the scammers.
It will take a law that says something about keeping a human in the loop, or that your reports should always be validated by a human.
When cost of living is a few hundred dollars a month at best, looting 10k from a single mark is going to last quite the time.
I've taken it from the article here: https://www.aura.com/learn/the-pig-butchering-scam
I could easily see giving very different advice to a friend with less scam awareness, though (like an older friend with limited knowledge of technology).
> There's a big difference between prisoners (who at least in theory are locked up as punishment for committing a crime) and people who've been trafficked into slavery[...] What's happening in SEA is kidnappping innocent people
Lots of people in prison are innocent, especially in the US. Prisoners are no less deserving of rights and fair treatment than victims of trafficking. Likewise, I'm sure many trafficking victims are guilty of committing crimes (as are most people).
Everywhere in the world it's accepted that prisoners lose the rights to freedom of movement and association; that's what being a prisoner means. In that sense trafficking victims are absolutely more deserving of those rights than convicted criminals.
No. you assume conviction = guilt, and that whatever treatment that comes thereafter is just.
For instance, it appears you would endorse treating people like these trafficking victims if they were first convicted by some court you consider valid, since "that's what being a prisoner means".
https://www.npr.org/2022/08/18/1118108084/michael-conahan-ma...
Except the innocent but incorrecty convicted (non)criminals.
On the other hand, some of the victims might not be convicted but guilty of something. But even those should better be taken care of by the regular system.
https://www.vera.org/news/research-shows-that-long-prison-se...
Instead of focusing on the penal system, which is fairly hopeless, we should focus on preventing people from entering the penal system in the first place by focusing on systematic improvements that reduce criminal behavior as an appealing option. Look up "rational choice theory" with regards to criminal behavior: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_choice_theory_(crimin...
But that all said, the fact that the penal system is not mutated based on sensible performance metrics such as recidivism rate etc. is a human failing. The thing is, the system has already failed them at that point and they made their decision to not cooperate with society, so of course the people who have chosen to cooperate with society (the same people who have not sufficiently contributed to the systematic improvements that would have prevented that behavior to begin with) will fail to care about them.
My participation in this is to mentor young men (some are "at-risk", which basically means that their demographics are more likely to lead to criminal behavior), which I've done a few times and which is rewarding, because young men really need it right now. If I didn't have a 2 year old son who is keeping my hands quite full, I think I'd do it again.
the main purpose is punishment, see: nonviolent drug offenders in prison
one might argue a higher level purpose is to keep "the right people" in prison, where they lose their freedom, sometimes including the freedom to run against, campaign against, and even vote out the politicians keeping them there
""" Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. """
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_Un...
If those issues were cleared up, then giving prisoners the opportunity to learn how to earn money legitimately would be good for rehabilitation. So prison labor is not intrinsically mistreatment.
A question for you: which country in “the west” can you think of that has worse prisoner treatment than the US?
Sometimes it's not even the majority. Politicians are elected for their main policies that usually involve a couple things, but there are thousands of laws and it doesn't follow that every one of them has majority support.
It's also a matter of inertia to "overthrow" the government in power. In democracies there's a peaceful way to do this, and in autocracies there isn't. The fact that autocratic governments aren't yet toppled does mean something, though obviously not much. But then, the fact that the government is democratically elected doesn't necessarily mean much either. (You sure Americans like Trump?)
While that may be true, surely philosophically speaking there's a significant, qualitative difference between saying "this is moral because people voted for it" and saying "this is moral because the stupid victims deserved it". Many people would accept the former, accept that prison labour is morally justified, but very few people would accept that it's morally okay for private criminal gangs to kidnap and enslave people.
The ancient Greeks often used crime or war as an excuse to capture slaves. At least they had the honesty to call them slaves afterwards
Considering what can probably get you in jail in a country like China, I’m not so sure about that.
[0] https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/editorial/bs-ed-1209-13...
Something that is "generally well known" by contrast is that China almost certainly harvested organs from prisoners in the 90s and early 2000s.
They’re Forced to Run Online Scams. Their Captors Are Untouchable (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37304188) (no comments)
Most users offered the jobs are getting them via everything apps like WeChat, Zalo, WhatsApp forwards, Viber, Line, etc.
I don't think that's an entirely accurate assessment. There's a significant userbase in Europe as well, on the same order of magnitude as North America.
The Tinder things are very rarely romance scams, they pivot to crypto scams immediately, "I work in the finance industry scoping out markets for crypto" etc - then I'd imagine they'd encourage someone to invest but they usually see through my attempts at scamming them back, one day I'll figure it out.
There is also the collateral, the profiles/photos they steal are of real people, which may or may not end up in real life ramifications for them. It used to be entirely generic Asians (Orient, not SE, as they're more attractive to the west apparently) - but these days they've upped the game and use region specific photos (ie; in my case, Slavic origin)
It’s becoming basically unusable unless you communicate with photo verified users only, but I’m sure a lot of photo verified accounts are run by these scammers too.
https://www.un.org/en/delegate/50-million-people-modern-slav...
https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/haven-for-scams-hit-movies...
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/jfk-files-how-soviet-lie-that-cia-...
I bet a human sounding bot can already make a phone call and scam most of our grandparents far better than the average human scammer. Add the ability to mimic the voice of a relative and you can get pretty high success rates, even with more tech-savvy victims I bet.
The "ethical hacker" shows them how to use an AI to spoof the 60 minutes host's voice, then use it to scam a 60 minutes employee on camera, in real time. It works.
Crypto has made scamming easier than ever. Ironically, it probably is making it easier to track how impactful it is too.
Do the 5-10 messages I get each week "Hi! This is Irene. Are you going to the party?" come from trafficed people?
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/10/8/indian-workers-resc...
Aside from enforcement and regulation, what really prevents these exploitative forms of labor from spreading?
I always assumed that they were not really doing this job by choice, whether it’s modern slavery or not.
You’re not saving someone else from getting scammed, you’re messing up a quota for someone who might be physically punished for missing it.
Or to put this in other terms; you're a Ukrainian machine gunner. In the distance you see Russian soldiers. You know that many of them are from the Russian gulags, unjustly imprisoned in an oppressive autocracy, quite likely for a crime they didn't commit, and now forced to invade a foreign country. You pull the trigger and mow those victims down, because if you don't those victims will make victims out of your friends, family, and fellow countrymen.
At some level, starving the beast is the only way to stop it. The more crimes they commit, the more likely it is they get caught. You can't account for the disposition of victims in the hands of thugs, and there's no guarantee victims won't get fed to pigs even if they were consistently Employee of the Month. If you already have a viable way to dispose of bodies, why let anybody leave?
The better reason not to play games with scammers is that you're antagonizing someone who does not respect rule of law. Consider what someone overconfident in their ability to commit crimes unchecked might do to you in retribution.
I think the UN is using the word "trafficked" way too liberally. While I heard stories from fellow travelers and citizens (only in Cambodia, be careful in Phnom Penh and don't go to Sinahouk); my guess is that the majority of these are in some kind of situation (like owing money to the boss) or maybe justifying what they are doing (it's not a crime if you are forced!).
For some reason, I find this "hundreds of thousands" quite sinister. It devalues the whole issue as it normalizes it; while there are some people now in real need of help and in real danger.
This comment feels mega weird to me, like you're trying to downplay the plight of these hundreds of thousands of modern-day slaves because it doesn't meet your definition of trafficking.
I'm certainly going to trust official figures coming from the UN over someone on HN who happens to be traveling in SEA
If you try to see how they got this number in their report it is "credible estimates/sources" that are "on file at OHCR". So there's no way to independently verify this, you have to just trust them, which doesn't breed confidence in their estimates.
There is a comment above about someone's Laotian wife working hard conditions doing these scams because it pays much better than local work -- this seems much more convincing.
Even the issue with the Vietnamese casino workers was only 40 people -- though not to minimize it's importance.