Dining like Darwin: When scientists swallow their subjects (2015)
npr.org
npr.org
"In Venezuela, capybara meat was so popular that sometime between the 16th and 18th centuries, clergymen petitioned to continue eating it during Lent. Although biology says otherwise, the Catholic Church agreed. They declared that the capybara was a “fish” and therefore acceptable to eat during Lent."
Found this after a bit of googling
Funny enough, I'm not too critical of it. I can't drive or operate a ship. Humanity is a bunch of disparate people trying to accomplish things together and sometimes it leads to very funny scenarios.
Flanders and Swan: The Reluctant Cannibal:
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pirates!_In_an_Adventure_w...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1743237/pdf/v08...
Edit: I forgot about sea food. So I guess its higher for many, but some people dont eat much seafood. Regardless, I still think it’s interesting that we eat a minuscule fraction of land animals.
I live these contradictions myself. When I meet individual cows, I'm often charmed. Or my friend keeps chickens that I enjoy feeding when I'm over. I would have a hard time eating the animals I had met, but I had a burger for dinner last night without the slightest problem.
There is beauty to a freshly cleaved piece of anthracite (like your cow example), but an industrial pile of coal does not.
Over the lifetime our cognition, through conditioning, accumulates or eliminated emotional associations with things. E.g. the common person from our culture that didn’t know they were eating a dog would have a visceral physiological response to the associated disgust their brain launches once they were told that in fact they ate the dog.
And it’s okay, these associations exist and people have initially little control over them.
But people in cultures other than ours don’t have this association conditioned, and for them it’s perfectly fine to eat dog.
This shows that this is just a thing in the head, not physiological. I used to be together with a farmer girl and she saw and raised a cow with her father from it’s beginning until it’s meat ended in her stomach as chewed through juicy steak.
Who’s “right” here? Nobody, it is what it is. Everything is possible.
One day, my daughter named three of the cows: Treemore, Chicken Nose, and Looneycake.
Chicken Nose had a pattern on her nose that looked like a chicken. I don't remember what the other two names meant.
Around that same time, we went to a friend's barbecue. His dad was a butcher, and he cooked the thickest steak I've ever seen. It must have been two inches or more.
"Cooked" may be overstating it. When he brought in the steak on a platter, it was all loose and jiggly, with blood dripping out of it.
When I asked him about it, he said "That's not blood. It's juice!"
I kind of lost my taste for beef after that. Pork too.
But some exceptions apply. I don't enjoy a hamburger or a pork chop, but on occasion I would have a hot dog or a piece of crisp bacon.
I guess if the meat is disguised enough I don't mind it as much?
Blood is hemoglobin, and circulates the body, delivering oxygen to where its needed. Whereas the "juice" from a piece of cooked meat is myoglobin, stores oxygen inside muscle cells until needed, and is responsible for the red color of meat in general.
People who live closer to the slaughtering process have a more flexible view of the pet/food distinction.
Then, most cookbooks call for these in recipes, so it becomes more in demand. This causes something of a cycle.
There are foods I would eat more if it was more available, like salt cod was very common in an area I used to live (with a lot of Portuguese ex-pats), but where I live now, it's only common around Christmas (because demand from the Italian Americans I live near now rise around this time). My buddy hunted an elk a while back so I was flush with elk meat for a while and if it was available and economical, I'd buy elk steaks from time to time, just to change things up.
Cod was much more common period prior to 1992.
I think you're right, or at least it's a major reason.
Before this article I have also observed that the only wild animals that people generally eat (at least in much of the developed world) is seafood. Most other meat, for most people, is farmed. Its not uncommon to eat fish that someone caught from the ocean, but it is uncommon to eat a bird that was shot out of the sky.
But yeah... more gamey than rabbit is my opinion. Pretty close to inedible. We put it in a pot-pie with a bunch of other stuff, so it wasn't horrible.
Related and possibly of interest:
https://beagleproject.wordpress.com/2014/01/04/having-dinner...