I'm not sure if "hatred" is the correct word here. Yes, there has been a ton of skepticism and doubt about V here in HN, but this is very different from hatred. In my opinion, skepticism is not only okay, but desirable in a community like HN. Skepticism is also a core principle in science. Skepticism can be respectful and encouraging.

I count myself among the skeptics of V. Mostly because in the initial communications about it, some of the claims were hard to believe. For example, they used to claim that V was memory safe without GC, but also without borrow checker, and it was never explained how they achieved such thing. Now I see that they claim that the language is very similar to Go, so I assume that they went with a GC. That's really cool, I actually think that GCs are a massive boon for language ergonomics. But there remain some unexplained topics, for example, how is that they achieve being "free of data races" [1]. It's nice to see a new language in the area and I hope the language succeed. But I'll continue to be skeptical until I see proper explanation of some of their claims.

[1] https://vlang.io/compare#go