My impression, having programmed quite a bit of Fortran, is that it’s not official at all. Also the language is maintained in a completely different way (standards Committee) so it feels off.
I didn’t intend to say that «not official» means «bad». I learned a lot of stuff from «non-official web pages» over the years.
Yes, I know, I understood that. Thank you. I was reacting to the term official, since it is an interesting question what official means for Fortran, since in a way it was "abandoned", there was the ISO committee as the only official body, but nobody wanted to provide an official place for it on the internet (the most official place was actually the Fortran Wikipedia article). So we volunteered that. In a way, I think it could already be treated as official, or if not, hopefully in a few years most people will treat it as the de-facto official. Kind of like the git webpage has migrated from https://repo.or.cz/ to https://git-scm.com/, but both in a way are unofficial, but the second one is a nice modern webpage and most people liked it and accepted it as official. I don't know the people behind either webpage.
There is quite a lot of discussion on the Discourse group ( https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/ ), which also involves both committee members and ordinary developers.
We regularly address unconstructive behavior. If you or anyone has some feedback how we can run things better, please let me know (you can email me at ondrej@certik.us).