Hacker News Reader

People are not part of nature?

at some odd level, your post intrigues me, are you saying that gay relationships being "unnatural" is why design data around it is so tough?

Does this kind of inquisitorial behavior really achieve anything?

It seems I need to explain better:

Nature decided that so called "gays" (an artificial term, created in our modern times) can't procreate, so if you would make an island for them, good old Nature would answer with extinction...

(I think Nature is really discriminating here. Someone should sue It.)

Well Nature (or God or whatever) decided that some people (through illness, genetical defect or whatever) are sterile and can't procreate... So they shouldn't be allowed to marry?

All homosexual marriages are sterile.

Some heterosexual marriages are sterile, too.

In my country, children are (currently!) really fortunate: they are guaranteed to have a mother and a father (yes, I know already your objections), and, as psychology is able to demonstrate, this is still the sanest and most harmonic way to grow children.

Why do we always exclude children from this reasoning?

a hole is a hole...