Perhaps the owners think the valuation is reasonable, and want liquidity. Selling at $10b+ is still a great achievement for a company founded in 2012.
I personally think that their UX is so terrible that they'd be eaten alive by anybody with a decent app.
LastPass, Amazon, Prime Video, Quora, Zoom, Facebook, WhatsApp, Apple Music, Outlook, Steam... that can be said of a dozen other popular apps, but unfortunately it's not that simple.
Their value is what exists on the server side-- the networks, the content, the connections. The app is realistically more of a cost centre for them, and potentially an opportunity for friction or underserved use cases.
Opening the door for third parties would give them opportunities to expand their market for no additional cost.
For example, I could see Instacart integrations into smart-appliance platforms, thus fulfilling the long-wibbled-about premise of "what if your refrigerator knew you were out of eggs and would order more."
Under "Undistributed earnings attributable to preferred stockholders"
This isn't because of a "downturn" per se, but it advantages some investors and the company as a whole.
agreed that it seems unlikely they can grow their per order profit but you never know, I guess.
And grocery delivery is very good during pandemic waves, like the upcoming COVID wave.
I don't think so. Their business is more or less a Deliveroo clone, which doesn't seem to be a good business model in the long term especially as a public company.
But it looks like they are attempting to use the ARM IPO as an opportunity to restart a new wave of IPOs. So they getting in on this new window of opportunity.
So expect yet another wave of unprofitable startups heading for the IPO exit. At least one profitable startup, Stripe could be going public next year. But who knows.
truly HN is a vast repository of wise commenters!