The Case For – and Against – Apple Shipping a Larger iMac
512pixels.net
512pixels.net
The reduced cable mess that comes with iMacs is amazing and over the years some of my favorite machines have been iMacs, but with how much screen panel quality has improved, it's non-optional for the display to be usable independent of the computer. Unfortunately this hasn't been possible ever since iMacs were upgraded from 2560x1440 panels to 5120x2880 panels, originally due to cable bandwidth limitations but that's no longer an issue.
The Studio Display is already very close to being an iMac already, complete with super overengineered flat PSU and cooling system… just swap out its A13 SoC with an M2 Pro and add a few ports and you've got a very nice VESA mountable desktop computer.
Consumers will likely keep these devices for many years and want to just upgrade the whole thing at once, and the fact that both the display and computer are on the cheaper side makes this feasible to make the usability tradeoff worth it. A pro use case would want to be able to upgrade the very expensive display and the very expensive computer at different rates. The upgrade cycles don't really line up.
I find the Studio Display to be 2X what I'd be willing to pay for a monitor—for me the Thunderbolt Display was the best: reasonable price and great quality.
Edit: looks like this is no longer a thing.
> Target display mode is a feature available with certain older Mac models.
https://www.duetdisplay.com/blog/how-to-use-your-imac-as-a-m...
Apparently you can use a TB cable to connect it up, so it might be reasonably performant as a productivity monitor!
I think you can also extend to some displays using AirPlay, but from memory performance wasn’t great when I tried.
Although a big iMac that could be specced from Mx Pro to Mx Ultra might be compelling.