Why the universe may be teeming with aliens
newscientist.com
newscientist.com
First it explains that the habitable zone for planets is bigger than we thought, but then it also introduces a ton of new criteria (other than distance from the planet's star) that must be met for a planet to support life (size, composition, orbit, etc.).
To me that implies that there is likely LESS life out there, not more. The summary version of the article as I read it is: over the past 20 years the habitable zone got bigger, but we realized that habitable zone is only one requirement of many for a planet to be habitable.
How does that support the article's title? (Serious question, not trying to be snarky. Me = not a science guy.)
But then these things have been known and being considered for decades. What calls for an article on this with such a sensational title?
Looks like this publication has a thing for sensationalism.IMO, not a very good indicator of being scientific.